 |
GENERAL INTRODUCTION |
 |
As EARLY as 1843 an attempt was made to arrange for
the preparation of Statistical Accounts of the different districts
of the Bombay Presidency. The following extract [Gazetteer of the
Bombay Presidency, Vol. I, Part I (History of Gujarat) pp. III and
IV.] will be found interesting as giving an idea of the intention of
those who desired to have such Accounts compiled:-
" Government called on
the Revenue Commissioner to obtain from all the Collectors as part
of their next Annual Report the fullest avail able information
regarding their districts............................Government
remarked that, as Collectors and their Assistants during the large
portion of the year moved about the district in constant and
intimate communication with all classes they possessed advantages
which no other public officers enjoyed of acquiring a full knowledge
of the condition of the country, the causes of progress or
retrogradation, the good measures which require to be fostered and
extended, the evil measures which call for abandonment, the defects
in existing institutions which require to be remedied, and the
nature of the remedies to be applied. Collectors also, it was
observed, have an opportunity of judging of the effect of British
rule on the condition and character of the people, and their caste
prejudices, and on their superstitious observances. They can trace
any alteration for the better or worse in dwellings, clothing and
diet, and can observe the use of improved implements of husbandry or
other crafts, the habits of locomotion, the state of education,
particularly among the higher classes whose decaying means and
energy under our most levelling system compared with that of
preceding governments will attract their attention. Finally they can
learn how far existing village institutions are effectual to their
end, and may be made available for self-government and in the
management of local taxation for local purposes.
" In obedience to
these orders, reports were received from the Collectors of
Ahmedabad, Broach, Kaira, Thana, and Khandesh. Some of the reports
contained much interesting information. These five northern reports
were practically the only result of the Circular Letter of
1842."
The matter does not seem to have been pursued any
further.
In October 1867, the Secretary of State for India
desired the Bombay Government to take concrete steps for the
compilation of a Gazetteer of the Presidency on the model of the
Gazetteer prepared during that year for the Central Provinces. The
Government of Bombay then requested some of its responsible
officials to submit a scheme for carrying into effect the orders of
the Secretary of State, and in 1868, appointed the Bombay Gazetteer
Committee to supervise and direct the preparation of the Gazetteer.
After a few organizational experiments the responsibility was
finally entrusted to Mr. James M. Campbell of the Bombay Civil
Service, who commenced the compilation in 1874 and completed the
series in 1884. The actual publication, however, of these volumes
was spread over a period of 27 years between 1877 and 1904 in which
year the last General Index volume was published.
Though a Gazetteer literally means only a
geographical index or a geographical dictionary, the scope of this
particular compilation was much wider. It included not only a
description of the physical and natural features of a region but
also a broad narrative of the social, political, economic and
cultural life of the people living in that region. The purpose which
the Gazetteer was intended to serve was made clear in the following
remarks of Sir William Hunter, Director-General of Statistics to the
Government of India, when his opinion was sought on a draft article
on Dharwar District in 1871. He said:-
" My own conception of
the work is that, in return for a couple ol days' reading, the
Account should give a new Collector a comprehensive, and, at the
same time, a distinct idea of the district which he has been sent to
administer. Mere reading can never supersede practical experience in
the district administration. But a succinct and well conceived
district account is capable of antedating the acquisition of such
personal experience by many months and of both facilitating and
systematising a Collector's personal enquiries................But in
all cases a District Account besides dealing with local specialities
should furnish a historical narration of its revenue and expenditure
since it passed under the British rule, of the sums which we have
taken from it in taxes, and of the amount which we have returned to
it in the protection of property and person and the other charges of
civil government." [Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency, Vol. I, Part
I (History of Gujarat) p. VII.]
The Gazetteer was thus intended to give a complete
picture of the district to men who were entire strangers to India
and its people but who as members of the ruling race carried on
their shoulders the responsibility of conducting administration.
The Gazetteer had 27 Volumes, some split up into two
or three Parts, making a total of 35 books including the General
Index which was published in 1904. Some of the Volumes were of a
general nature and were not confined to the limits of a particular
district. For example, Volume I dealt with History and was split up
into two Parts, one dealing with Gujarat and the other with Konkan,
Dekhan and Southern Maratha Country; Volume IX was devoted to the
Population of Gujarat and contained two parts, one describing Hindus
and the other Mussalmans and Parsis. but there was no corresponding
Volume devoted to the Population of Maharashtra or Karnatak; Volume
XXV gave an account of the Botany of the area covered in the whole
Presidency. The remaining Volumes dealt with the various districts
of the Presidency and with what were then known as Native States
attached to the Bombay Presidency. Some of the District Volumes had
two or three Parts, for example, those of Thana, Kanara, Poona and
Bombay. On the other hand, there was only one combined Volume for
some districts, as for example, Surat and Broach, and Kaira and
Panch Mahals.
The scheme of the contents was more or less the same
for all the District Volumes though the accounts of particular items
varied considerably from district to district. Information was
collected from Government Offices and, in respect of social and
religious practices, from responsible citizens. Eminent scholars,
experts and administrators contributed articles on special subjects.
This Gazetteer compiled over seventy years ago had
long become scarce and entirely out of print. It contained authentic
and useful information on several aspects of life in a district and
was considered to be of great value to the administrator, the
scholar and the general reader. There was a general desire that
there should be a new and revised edition of this monumental work.
The then Government of Bombay, therefore, decided that the old
Gazetteer should be revised and republished, and entrusted the work
of revision to an Editorial Board specially created for that purpose
in 1949. This new edition has been prepared under the direction of
that Editorial Board. With the reorganisation of States in 1956 and
with the coming into existence of the State of Maharashtra in 1960,
areas for which no District Gazetteers had previously been compiled
will be taken up and new Disitrict Gazetteers will be compiled in
accordance with the common pattern.
In the nature of things, after a lapse of over 80
years after their publication, most of the statistical information
contained in the old Gazetteer had become entirely out of date and
had to be dropped altogether. In this edition an attempt has been
made to give an idea of the latest developments, whether in regard
to the administrative structure or the economic set-up or in regard
to social, religious and cultural trends. There are portions in the
old Gazetteer bearing on archaeology and history which have the
impress of profound scholarship and learning and their worth has not
diminished by the mere passage of time. Even in their case, however,
some restatement is occasionally necessary in view of later
investigations and new archaeological discoveries by scholars, and
an attempt has been made to incorporate in this edition the results
of such subsequent research. The revision of the old Volumes has, in
fact, meant an entire re-writing of most of the chapters and
sections. In doing so, statistical and other information was
obtained from the relevant Departments of Government, and articles
on certain specialized subjects were obtained from competent
scholars.
In this dynamic world, circumstances and facts of
life change, and so do national requirements and social values. Such
significant changes have taken place in India as in other countries
during the last half a century, and more so after the advent of
Independence in 1947. The general scheme and contents of this
revised series of the Gazetteer have been adapted to the needs of
altered conditions. There is inevitably some shift in emphasis in
the presentation and interpretation of certain phenomena. For
example, the weighted importance given to caste and community in the
old Gazetteer cannot obviously accord with the ideological concepts
of a secular democracy, though much of that data may have
considerable interest from the functional, sociological or cultural
point of view. What is necessary is a change in perspective in
presenting that account so that it could be viewed against the
background of a broad nationalism and the synthesis of a larger
social life. It is also necessary to abridge and even to eliminate,
elaborate details about customs and practices which no longer obtain
on any extensive scale or which are too insignificant to need any
elaboration. In the revised Gazetteer, therefore, only a general
outline of the practices and customs of the main sections of the
population has been given.
An important addition to the District Volume in this
edition is the Directory of Villages and Towns given at the end
which contains, in a tabulated form, useful information about every
village and town in the district. The district maps given in this
edition are also fairly large and up-to-date.
The revised Gazetteer will be published in two
series:-
1. The General Series.-This
will comprise Volumes on subjects which can best be treated for the
State as a whole and not for the smaller area of a district. As at
present planned, they will deal with Physical Features, People and
Their Culture, History, Language and Literature, Botany, and Public
Administration.
2. The District Series.-This will
contain one Volume for every district of the Maharashtra State. The
information given in all Volumes will follow the same pattern, and
the table of contents will more or less be the same for all
districts.
It was originally thought feasible to number the
district volumes in the alphabetical order in the District Series
and accordingly the Poona Volume which was the first revised
District Gazetteer to be compiled and published by the Board (in
1954) was numbered as Volume XX. However, the arrangement was not
found to be suitable and it was, therefore, subsequently decided not
to give any number to any volume.
In the preparation of this volume the Board has
received every assistance from Gazetteers unit, Ministry of
Scientific Research and Cultural Affairs, Government of India. A
draft copy of this volume was sent to the Gazetteers unit and was
returned with valuable suggestions which have been incorporated in
the volume. The Government of India gives a grant-in-aid of Rs.
6,000 per each volume towards the cost of compilation and 40 per
cent, of the actual printing charges.
|
Bombay, |
P. SETU
MADHAVA RAO, |
|
December, 1960. |
Executive
Editor and
Secretary. |
|